tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34418100.post2646373973172025952..comments2023-10-23T09:21:51.854-04:00Comments on Title IX Blog: Idaho case reexaminedEBuzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15887304836671743255noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34418100.post-90457665532411258842007-09-25T21:18:00.000-04:002007-09-25T21:18:00.000-04:00DOE|OCR's has been in a political process, guided ...DOE|OCR's has been in a political process, guided by the current administration, of adbication of Title IX oversight and enforcement nationally. Not undtil a state senator and congress-woman intervened did OCR reconsider the complaint which they never investigated to begin with.<BR/><BR/>OCR data in a 10 year history show a dramatic shift away from corrective action. It illustrates a clear and purposeful reduction from 62%, by half, year by year, of dismissals of Title IX complaint investigations to less than 12%, of which many complaints were buried that should have resulted in corrective action. Now Title IX complaints have been prematurely dismissed by OCR "evaluation" for what they term " insufficient evidence of a violation". OCR is simply not investigating complaints, frustrating complainants with insessant delay, and thus prematurely arrives at this determination WITHOUT actually acquiring evidence from an investigation.<BR/><BR/>It is particularly humorous that Coeur d'Alene school officials can posit they are in compliance. They have no survey data of girls interest ever being done by the district, and with a HUGE 16% disparity in girls athletic participation, the district has no basis to make such a claim. The fact that they never had a Title IX officer further exposes their over-confidence and indifference to discriminating hundreds of young women.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com