Even as single-sex education continues to be touted as the solution for everything that ails public education, new research findings reported this week suggest that it provides no advantages over coed classrooms. Psychologists conducted a meta-analysis of 184 studies from all over the world and going back several decades that examined the benefits of single-sex- versus co-education. Their conclusion derived from these studies are that differences in educational outcomes are "trivial, or in many cases, nonexistent." The subset of studies conducted in the U.S. produced a similar conclusion.
This analysis could potentially influence courts' and regulators' determinations of whether the ever-increasing number of schools purporting to experiment with single sex education are lawful under Title IX. Title IX regulations require single-sex programs to be "substantially related to achieving" the school's objectives. Evidence that single-sex programs do nothing would undermine claims that they "achieve" anything.
An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools.
Bad investigations
The more I learn about the ins and outs of Title IX (and Title VI) investigations, the more pessimistic I become about the ability of these...
-
Three former employees of Feather River College (Quincy, California) pressed their Title IX retaliation claims at a two-week hearing before...
-
In the wake of the Quinnipiac case, in which it seemed that the university somewhat spitefully cut men's track and field when it was tol...
-
The NCAA has come out with a very clear position on sexual relationships between coaches and student-athletes. They are wrong. They are a ...