USA Today is reporting that Democratic leaders of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce plan to let the grant currently matching state funding for abstinence-only education expire next month without renewal.
Even though the article cites religious conservatives' "surprise" at this "radical" policy, I think think the writing has been on the wall for some time. Last November, we posted about survey evidence suggesting overwhelming public support for comprehensive sex education, as well as recent independent studies on the harmful gender stereotyping that plays out in some of the popular, government-approved sex ed curricula. Then in April, the LA Times reported that states themselves are increasingly opting out of the federal money after government research found that abstinence-only programs are ineffective at preventing pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. This suggests that the federal matching funds were becoming irrelevant anyway. Nonetheless, I'm looking forward to Congress's final farewell to this failed federal policy.
An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bad investigations
The more I learn about the ins and outs of Title IX (and Title VI) investigations, the more pessimistic I become about the ability of these...
-
Three former employees of Feather River College (Quincy, California) pressed their Title IX retaliation claims at a two-week hearing before...
-
In the wake of the Quinnipiac case, in which it seemed that the university somewhat spitefully cut men's track and field when it was tol...
-
The NCAA has come out with a very clear position on sexual relationships between coaches and student-athletes. They are wrong. They are a ...
No comments:
Post a Comment