An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools.
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
OCR Affirms Cuts at Ohio University
As we predicted back in April, OCR has rejected a petition challenging Ohio University's decision to cut four athletic teams earlier this year. The petitioners argued that OU's decision was discriminatory because more men's opportunities were cut than women's. We suggested that because women already received disproportionately fewer athletic opportunities, there was nothing discriminatory about OU's decision to seek balance in their athletic offerings, and it appears that OCR agrees.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bad investigations
The more I learn about the ins and outs of Title IX (and Title VI) investigations, the more pessimistic I become about the ability of these...
-
Three former employees of Feather River College (Quincy, California) pressed their Title IX retaliation claims at a two-week hearing before...
-
In the wake of the Quinnipiac case, in which it seemed that the university somewhat spitefully cut men's track and field when it was tol...
-
The NCAA has come out with a very clear position on sexual relationships between coaches and student-athletes. They are wrong. They are a ...
No comments:
Post a Comment