The Coeur d'Alene school district in Idaho thought it was done with Title IX investigations after a complaint that charged the district with "historical and callous practice of denying civil rights" was investigated and unable to be substantiated. But the anonymous complainant has introduced new evidence that convinced OCR at the end of August to re-open the case. No one is saying what the new information is but the initial complaint cited the district for not meeting the interests and abilities of girls, disparity in coaching, and lack of a district Title IX coordinator.
The administrators in Coeur d'Alene seem confident this new information will not alter the initial finding of compliance.
An interdisciplinary resource for news, legal developments, commentary, and scholarship about Title IX, the federal statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded schools.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Department of Energy is making Title IX rules?
In one of the more curious things I have seen in regard to Title IX rule-making, the Department of Energy is attempting to issue a change t...
-
In one of the more curious things I have seen in regard to Title IX rule-making, the Department of Energy is attempting to issue a change t...
-
Three former employees of Feather River College (Quincy, California) pressed their Title IX retaliation claims at a two-week hearing before...
-
...and a sort of validation of my earlier prediction. Last week's multi-billion settlement (still in need of final approval by the judg...
1 comment:
DOE|OCR's has been in a political process, guided by the current administration, of adbication of Title IX oversight and enforcement nationally. Not undtil a state senator and congress-woman intervened did OCR reconsider the complaint which they never investigated to begin with.
OCR data in a 10 year history show a dramatic shift away from corrective action. It illustrates a clear and purposeful reduction from 62%, by half, year by year, of dismissals of Title IX complaint investigations to less than 12%, of which many complaints were buried that should have resulted in corrective action. Now Title IX complaints have been prematurely dismissed by OCR "evaluation" for what they term " insufficient evidence of a violation". OCR is simply not investigating complaints, frustrating complainants with insessant delay, and thus prematurely arrives at this determination WITHOUT actually acquiring evidence from an investigation.
It is particularly humorous that Coeur d'Alene school officials can posit they are in compliance. They have no survey data of girls interest ever being done by the district, and with a HUGE 16% disparity in girls athletic participation, the district has no basis to make such a claim. The fact that they never had a Title IX officer further exposes their over-confidence and indifference to discriminating hundreds of young women.
Post a Comment